The report was presented by Prime Minister Andrej Plenković.
Nino Raspudić (Bridge) said the Council of the EU rejected Croatia’s amendments on legitimate political representation and the equality of three constituent peoples in BiH through an electoral reform ahead of a vote due in October.
He said that instead of Croatia blocking those conclusions in line with its national interest, the Plenković cabinet “coldly betrayed Croats in Bosnia and Herzegovina as well as the Croatian interest overall.”
Foreign Minister Gordan Grlić Radman said the Council of the EU conclusions were the incumbent government’s biggest success. “If anyone has done something for Croats in BiH, then it’s Plenković and all of us who were there with him.”
Social Democratic Party president Peđa Grbin said that last year the European Council called on the member states and the Commission to help the most vulnerable citizens and companies, to design medium and long-term measures to cut energy prices, and to cut taxes.
“Croatia has done none of that. The only measure was that freezing of fuel prices,” he said, adding that Croatia could do a lot to help citizens and businesses.
Grbin said that at the European Council Croatia joined France and some other member states in pushing for nuclear energy, asking why Croatia was not joining countries that pushed for alternative sources. In the long term, he said, Croatia must deal with energy sources and achieving the biggest autonomy possible on that front.
Grbin said the SDP was for Croatia’s entering Schengen and for using money from the EU Solidarity Fund for post-earthquake reconstruction.
He called on the government to give an estimate, based on the current inflation, of what awaits Croatia with the introduction of the euro and of how to alleviate the inflation blow to citizens.
Bojan Glavašević (Green-Left Bloc) said Croatia received a lot of money from the EU because it was undeveloped and poor, not because of the prime minister’s efforts.
He said the results of Croatia’s efforts regarding EU enlargement were such that North Macedonia continued to have a shameful blockade of its accession negotiations, Serbia was adopting laws that were the opposite of the EU acquis and values, and Montenegro was going backward.
The EU has no understanding for BiH and the Croats there nor a big interest in the Croatian government’s positions in that regard, Glavašević added.
Marko Pavić of the ruling HDZ said that while Bridge wanted to isolate Croatia in the EU and the Sovereignists were against the euro, even though a majority of citizens were for, the HDZ was pushing for modern sovereignism and not isolating Croatia in the European Council.
He said the government and Plenković knew how to defend Croatia’s interests, as evidenced in their ensuring €25 billion from European funds for the country’s development over the next ten years.
Croatia came out of the recent crisis in just 18 months, and not in ten years as it took after the 2008 crisis, Pavić said, adding that despite the recent crisis, Croatia’s credit rating was upgraded and it had a successful tourist season.
He wondered why Grbin was afraid of nuclear energy and why Croatia, as a co-owner of the Krško nuclear plant, should not be part of the initiative to have nuclear energy recognized as green energy.
For more, check out our dedicated politics section.
