Speaking at a cabinet session, he said pregnancy termination was an extremely complex legal, ethical and medical issue on which it was often impossible to reach a consensus, but that it was necessary to consider the matter.
“This ruling won’t impact Croatia. In Croatia, the right to pregnancy termination is regulated by law and the Constitutional Court has found that the law is in line with the Constitution.”
As the Court’s president Miroslav Šeparović said recently, banning pregnancy termination would be contrary to the Court’s ruling, as would a referendum to restrict or ban pregnancy termination rights, Plenković said.
“In the political sense, there’s no need to misinform people with the goal of scoring political points and there’s no need to include in the Constitution regulations on an already existing right. We won’t agree to such changes.”
He called on the opposition to be constructive about this issue and to support changes to the constitutional law on the Constitutional Court, which he said were aimed at additionally protecting constitutional rights, those that cannot be decided in referenda.
Plenković said the ruling HDZ was a Christian Democrat centre-right party advocating the protection of life from conception, while also respecting a woman’ right to choose and health.
“Our wish is that there are as few pregnancy terminations in our society as possible, that they are the exception, but statistics and other countries’ experience show that this is not achieved by bans. Bans don’t lead to fewer abortions, but can make them unsafe and dangerous for a woman’s life and health.”
Politics: For more, check out our politics section.
